I've been introspecting a lot over the past 6 months. This has been a time of tremendous growth for both me and
The Husband. The process involves a combination of me observing my thoughts and behaviours, comparing those observations with situations describes in some of the good
aspie books that we have then talking over my observations with
The Husband. It surprises me still how much I don't understand in the flow conversation with
NTs and it surprises the hell out of
TH how good I am at pretending to be normal and covering up my ignorance and confusion.

My latest breakthrough in understanding my world is a new rule: when confusion strikes in conversation, it's because the other person is having feelings. I doubt this will surprise
NTs since, from what many people have said to me, it's quite normal for
NTs to be cognisant of the emotional state of others. Sometimes their accuracy in telling other's emotions is better than at other times but in my case, it almost never occurs to me that other people have emotions or that I might be able to discern them and that their emotions affect our interaction.
NTs have a much broader and deeper range of emotional responses that occur more frequently than I experience. I can't speak for other
aspies but I'm concious now that my emotional domain isn't spacious. I'm quite content with this situation since it appears that the greater the emotional range that
NTs have, the greater the burden that they must carry. While there are undoubtably great highs to be had, the lows seem to come a bit more frequently. The relationship between
NTs and their emotions seems to me at times like a drug addict chasing their next fix. Despite having to wade through some terrible comedowns and being driven to desperate acts from time to time, the highs are always worth the chase. The more balanced and happy
NTs around me seem to have a more moderate relationship with their feelings and, from my very limited perceptive stance, a more manageable emotional range. So I'm quite happy being me in this regard.
The new rule is very useful to me. When I find myself tripping over something in conversation I try to take stock of what the emotional component might be. I've taken to asking
TH how he perceives the same emotional component of conversations where he was also present or about conversations I've had with him and I'm getting better at figuring it out. As with my own emotional depth, my guesses tend towards a shallower interpretation of emotions in others when compared with
TH's interpretation of the same event. Where previously I would just be confused and lost, I now have a handle of what I might have missed and this has had a wonderful effect on lowering my stress in social situations.
Like many
aspies, I take words quite literally. A turn of phrase that has always confused and annoyed me is "when I ______, as a person, ...". As a person? Yes I can see you are one. What the hell else would you be? "When I _____, as a teenage mutant ninja turtle?" It occurred to me to apply the new rule and calculated that the most likely option is that the person is deliberately trying to emphasise their emotions in the conversation and to indicate that their emotions are strongly felt on the topic under discussion.
TH more or less agrees. OK, one less thing to be confused about in conversation. One less scenario that might cause me stress.
We're getting there. :-)